REU for
Ecosystems in Transition - Home
Educational Training Sessions
Case Study Discussions
Independent Research Projects
Communicating Research Results
Career
Exploration
Recreational Activities
Schedule for 2005
Application Forms
Mentors
Cooperating Research Projects
Travel
and Lodging
|
REU Site for
Ecosystems in Transition:
The Role of
Research in Assessing Ecosystem Responses to a Changing Environment:
This program
will not be held in 2008.
We hope to resume the program in 2009.
|

|
Case
Study Discussions: Linking Research, Policy
and Management.
Ecological research priorities
and funding are often influenced by the information needs of policy makers
who must address current “hot” environmental issues. Unfortunately, research that adequately
answers complex ecological questions often requires much more time than is
available before policy decisions must be made. The result can be heated, often
inconclusive debate. Through a series
of three Case Study discussions, the REU students examined the difficulties
that are faced in using the best available current research to develop
management policies in a timely fashion, while also taking into account
public opinion. The need to adjust
management plans as better information becomes available from the scientific
community also was discussed. Case
Studies held in 2004 and 2005 included:
Responding to exotic pest invasion: the emerald ash borer in Michigan. This Asian pest was discovered in the Detroit area in 2001 and
rapidly kills infested ash trees.
Researchers, including Dr. Andrew Storer at MTU’s Center for Exotic
Species (http://forest.mtu.edu/research/ces/
) rapidly mobilized to learn as much
as possible about the extent of the infestation, susceptibility of our native
ash species, and potential control strategies. To prevent this potentially devastating
pest from escaping the Detroit, Michigan - Windsor,
Ontario area, potentially
controversial measures are being considered, including removing all ash trees
from a 3-mile-wide buffer zone surrounding the infested area and banning
campers from bringing their own firewood to state parks and forests. Dr. Storer and colleagues from the Center
for Exotic Species will present a discussion of: the research methods employed to rapidly
learn about the invasion; the cooperative, international efforts of the
research community, local governments and regulatory agencies needed to
devise and implement control strategies; and the importance of communicating
with the public to help ensure successful control while limiting the spread
of false information that inhibits control efforts.
Wolf-man interactions: recovery, reintroduction and public
perception. Gray wolf
populations in the Upper Great Lakes region
have recovered to the point that the species has been reclassified from
endangered to threatened, and may soon be de-listed entirely. However special rules exist that allow
taking wolves for protection of human safety and livestock, research, and
other specific purposes. In other
areas of the US, such as Yellowstone National Park
and the southern Rockies, wolves have recently
been reintroduced. In all of these
areas, public opinion regarding wolves varies greatly among different groups
and can be quite volatile. Researchers
at MTU, including Dr. Rolf Peterson and Dr. John Vucetich, have been involved
in wolf research in all of these regions as well as other locations
world-wide. Discussions were held on
the impact of wolves on ecosystems, the role of research in wolf
reintroduction and recovery efforts, and the importance of understanding and
addressing public concerns regarding these sometimes controversial efforts.
Research and policy: the chicken and egg of global change. State, national and international policies
regarding the production of CO2, NOx, SO4,
and O3 have existed for decades.
Often, these policies have called for and funded the research needed
to help define the possible consequences of these pollutants and appropriate
control mechanisms. However, to
realistically understand long-term effects in natural systems, multiple years
of response data are needed.
Consequently, regulations controlling emissions have been put in place
before adequate research could be completed, displeasing both those who think
the controls have gone to far and those who believe more needs to be
done. Field-based global change
research projects are only now reaching the point where sufficient long-term
records exist, and realistic studies of the interactions among global change
factors are almost wholly lacking. At
MTU, researchers have been studying the long-term effects of N deposition,
elevated CO2, elevated O3 and their interactions in
natural forest ecosystems. Dr. Andrew
Burton led a discussion of these research projects and the historical use of
adequate research data (or lack thereof) for developing global change policies
and regulation.
We were fortunate to have
experts on the topics listed above at MTU and could bring in additional
persons from federal and state agencies, graduate students working on these
problems, and citizens who have specific concerns regarding the issues to
participate in the Case Study discussions.
The goal was for the REU students to understand that there are many
sides to every issue, and research results are only one portion of the
information that ultimately governs policy and management.
Following the three Case Study discussions, a group
discussion on basic versus applied research was held. Students
used examples from the Case Study discussions and from the projects on which
they are working as a basis for this group session.
|